References [ 8 ]
Triemer RE, Linton E, Shin W, Nudelman A, Monfils A, Bennett M & Brosnan S (2006) Phylogeny of the Euglenales based up on combined SSU and LSU rDNA sequence comparisons and description of Discoplastis gen. nov. (Euglenophyta). Journal of Phycology 42(3): 731-740.
Milanowski R, Kosmala S, Zakryś B & Kwiatowski J (2006) Phylogeny of photosynthetic euglenophytes based on combined chloroplast and cytoplasmic SSU rDNA sequence analysis. Journal of Phycology 42: 721-730.
Ciugulea I, Nudelman MA, Brosnan S & Triemer RE (2008) Phylogeny of the Euglenoid loricate genera Trachelomonas and Strombomonas (Euglenophyta) inferred from nuclear SSU and LSU rDNA. Journal of Phycology 44: 406-418.
Kim JI & Shin W (2008) Phylogeny of the Euglenales inferred from plastid LSU rDNA sequences. Journal of Phycology 44: 994-1000.
Linton EW, Karnkowska-Ishikawa A, Kim JI, Shin W, Bennett MS, Kwiatowski J, Zakrys B & Triemer RE (2010) Reconstructing euglenoid evolutionary relationships using three genes: nuclear SSU and LSU, and chloroplast SSU rDNA sequences and the description of Euglenaria gen. nov. (Euglenophyta). Protist 161: 603-619.
Marin B, Palm A, Klingberg M & Melkonian M (2003) Phylogeny and taxonomic revision of plastid-containing euglenophytes based on SSU rDNA sequence comparisons and synapomorphic signatures in the SSU rDNA secondary structure. Protist 154: 99-145.
DOI: none
Triemer RE & Farmer MA (2007) A decade of euglenoid molecular phylogenetics. In: Unravelling the algae: the past, present and future of algal systematics. Ed. Brodie J & Lewis J. CRC Press : 315-330.
DOI: none
Kim JI, Shin W & Triemer RE (2013) Cryptic speciation in the genus Cryptoglena (Euglenaceae) revealed by nuclear and plastid SSU and LSU rRNA gene. Journal of Phycology 49: 92-102.
DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12032
Division/Phylum: Euglenophyta/Euglenozoa
Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology
and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee
that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive
from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and
Adl et al. (2019) for protists.
Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium:
JM:SE;
Bacteria present; maintained by serial subculture;
| Attributes | |
| Authority | Ehrenberg 1834 |
| Isolator | Pringsheim (1947) |
| Collection Site | Jesus Ditch, Cambridge, England |
| Climatic Zone | Temperate |
| Notes | Isolated by pipetting; clonal culture |
| Axenicity Status | Bacteria present |
| Area | Europe |
| Country | UK |
| Environment | Freshwater |
| GMO | No |
| In Scope of Nagoya Protocol | No |
| ABS Note | Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain. |
| Collection Date | c 1947 |
| Pathogen | Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1 |
| Strain Maintenance Sheet | |
| Toxin Producer | Not Toxic / No Data |
| Type Culture | No |
| Taxonomy WoRMS ID | 616087 |
| Equivalent Strains | UTEX 571 |