References [ 8 ]
Milanowski R, Kosmala S, Zakryś B & Kwiatowski J (2006) Phylogeny of photosynthetic euglenophytes based on combined chloroplast and cytoplasmic SSU rDNA sequence analysis. Journal of Phycology 42: 721-730.
Esteban GF, Finlay BJ & Clarke KJ (2009) Sequestered organelles sustain aerobic microbial life in anoxic environments. Environmental Microbiology 11: 544-550.
Linton EW, Karnkowska-Ishikawa A, Kim JI, Shin W, Bennett MS, Kwiatowski J, Zakrys B & Triemer RE (2010) Reconstructing euglenoid evolutionary relationships using three genes: nuclear SSU and LSU, and chloroplast SSU rDNA sequences and the description of Euglenaria gen. nov. (Euglenophyta). Protist 161: 603-619.
Fenchel T, Esteban GF & Finlay BJ (1997) Local versus global diversity of microorganisms: Cryptic diversity of ciliated protozoa. Oikos 80: 220-225.
DOI: none
Marin B, Palm A, Klingberg M & Melkonian M (2003) Phylogeny and taxonomic revision of plastid-containing euglenophytes based on SSU rDNA sequence comparisons and synapomorphic signatures in the SSU rDNA secondary structure. Protist 154: 99-145.
DOI: none
Triemer RE & Farmer MA (2007) A decade of euglenoid molecular phylogenetics. In: Unravelling the algae: the past, present and future of algal systematics. Ed. Brodie J & Lewis J. CRC Press : 315-330.
DOI: none
Kim JI, Shin W & Triemer RE (2013) Cryptic speciation in the genus Cryptoglena (Euglenaceae) revealed by nuclear and plastid SSU and LSU rRNA gene. Journal of Phycology 49: 92-102.
DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12032
Müllner AN, Angeler DG, Samuel R, Linton EW & Triemer RE (2001) Phylogenetic analysis of phagotrophic, phototrophic and osmotrophic euglenoids by using the nuclear 18S rDNA sequence. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 51: 783-791.
Division/Phylum: Euglenophyta/Euglenozoa Class: Euglenophyceae Order: Euglenales
Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology
and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee
that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive
from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and
Adl et al. (2019) for protists.
Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium:
JM:SE;
Bacteria and other organisms present; maintained by serial subculture;
| Attributes | |
| Authority | (Drezepolski) Nudelman & Triemer 2006 |
| Isolator | Droop (1951) |
| Collection Site | cow's hoof print near Lyme Regis, Dorset, England, UK |
| Climatic Zone | Temperate |
| Notes | Images 1-2 by Bozena Zakrys, Warsaw University and identity amended to P. aenigmaticus May 2001; Renamed as per AlgaeBase after taxonomic revision. |
| Axenicity Status | Bacteria and other organisms present |
| Area | Europe |
| Country | UK |
| Environment | Freshwater |
| GMO | No |
| In Scope of Nagoya Protocol | No |
| ABS Note | Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain. |
| Collection Date | c 1951 |
| Pathogen | Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1 |
| Strain Maintenance Sheet | |
| Toxin Producer | Not Toxic / No Data |
| Type Culture | No |
| Taxonomy WoRMS ID | 577248 |
| Equivalent Strains | SAG B1261-9,UTEX 1284 as P. megalopsis |
| Synonyms | Phacus aenigmaticus |
| Formerly Listed in CCAP as | Phacus megalopsis,Phacus aenigmaticus Drezepolski 1921 |
CCAP 1261/9
Monomorphina aenigmaticus
- Product Code: CCAP 1261/9
- Availability: See Availability/Lead Times