References [ 1 ]
De Jonckheere JF, Brown S, Walochnik J, Aspöck H & Michel R (2005) Morphological investigation of three Tetramitus spp. which are phylogenetically ver closely related: Tetramitus horticolus, Tetramitus russelli n. comb. and Tetramitus pararusselli n. sp. European Journal of Protistology 41: 139-150.
Division/Phylum: Discoba Class: Heterolobosea Order: Schizopyrenida

Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and Adl et al. (2019) for protists.

Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium: NN; Bacteria present; maintained by serial subculture; room temp; contains non-pathogenic E. coli as food source.
Attributes
AuthorityDe Jonckheere, Brown et al. 2004
IsolatorWalochnik (2001)
Collection Sitefaeces from an Uromastix acanthinura (out of a terrarium) Vienna, Austria
Notes Isolation: plate culture method
Axenicity Status Bacteria present
Area Europe
Country Austria
Environment Animal
GMO No
Group Protozoa
In Scope of Nagoya Protocol No
ABS Note Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain.
Collection Date c 2001
Original Designation 123R
Pathogen Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1
Strain Maintenance Sheet
Toxin Producer Not Toxic / No Data
Type Culture Yes
Taxonomy WoRMS ID
Synonyms Schizopyrenus russelli , Vahlkampfia russelli

CCAP 1581/3

Tetramitus russelli