References [ 1 ]
Beardsley C, Knittel K, Amann R & Pernthaler J (2005) Quantification and distinction of aplastidic and plastidic marine nanoplankton by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 41: 163-169.
DOI: none
Sequences [ 1 ]
EMBL/Genbank Links
(Bold text = submission by CCAP staff or collaborators)
Division/Phylum: Heterokontophyta/Ochrophyta Class: Dictyochophyceae Order: Pedinellales

Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and Adl et al. (2019) for protists.

Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium: ASW; Bacteria present; maintained by serial subculture; + 2 rice grains
Attributes
AuthorityPatterson & Fenchel
IsolatorFenchel (1981)
Collection Site Limfjord, Denmark
Axenicity Status Bacteria present
Area Europe
Country Denmark
Environment Marine
GMO No
Group Protozoa
In Scope of Nagoya Protocol No
ABS Note Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain.
Collection Date c 1981
Pathogen Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1
Strain Maintenance Sheet SM_Pteridomonasdanica.pdf
Toxin Producer Not Toxic / No Data
Type Culture Yes
Taxonomy WoRMS ID 341762

CCAP 1969/1

Pteridomonas danica