References [ 7 ]
Wu H, Hseu R & Lin L (2001) Identification of Chlorella spp. isolates using ribosomal DNA sequences. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica 42: 115-121.
DOI: none
Zhang J, Huss VAR, Sun X, Chang K & Pang D (2008) Morphology and phylogenetic position of a trebouxiophycean green alga (Chlorophyta) growing on the rubber tree, Hevea brasiliensis, with the description of a new genus and species. European Journal of Phycology 43: 185-193.
Coder DM & Goff LJ (1986) The host range of the chlorellavorous bacterium ("Vampirovibrio chlorellavorus"). Journal of Phycology 22: 543-546.
DOI: none
Darienko T & Pröschold T (2015) Genetic variability and taxonomic revision of the genus Auxenochlorella (Shihira et Krauss) Kalina et Puncocharova (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta). Journal of Phycology 51: 394-400.
Driver T, Bajhaiya AK, Allwood JW, Goodacre R, Pittman JK & Dean AP (2015) Metabolic responses of eukaryotic microalgae to environmental stress limit the ability of FT-IR spectroscopy for species identification. Algal Research 11: 148-155.
Osundeko O, Dean AP, Davies H & Pittman JK (2014) Acclimation of microalgae to wastewater environments involves increased oxidative stress tolerance activity. Plant & Cell Physiology 55: 1848-1857.
Darienko T & Pröschold T (2019) The genus Jaagichlorella Reisigl (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta) and its close relatives: an evolutionary puzzle Phytotaxa 388: 47-68.
Sequences [ 6 ]
EMBL/Genbank Links
(Bold text = submission by CCAP staff or collaborators)
18S-28S
ITS
ITS
Division/Phylum: Chlorophyta Class: Trebouxiophyceae Order: Chlorellales

Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and Adl et al. (2019) for protists.

Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium: 3N-BBM+V; Bacteria present; Cryopreserved;
Attributes
Authority(Chodat) Darienko & Pröschold 2019
IsolatorKluyver
Collection Site Delft, Holland, Netherlands
Notes Images 1-3 by Tatyana Darienko; renamed after Darienko & Pröschold (2019)
Axenicity Status Bacteria present
Area Europe
Country Netherlands
Environment Freshwater
GMO No
In Scope of Nagoya Protocol No
ABS Note Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain.
Collection Date pre 1986
Pathogen Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1
Strain Maintenance Sheet SM_FreshwaterGreens.pdf
Toxin Producer Not Toxic / No Data
Type Culture No
Taxonomy WoRMS ID 1327745
Equivalent StrainsATCC 30406,SAG 211-3,UTEX 22
Synonyms Chlorella luteoviridis
Formerly Listed in CCAP asChlorella luteoviridis

CCAP 211/3

Jaagichlorella luteoviridis


Related Products

3N-BBM+V Medium<br>CONCENTRATED STOCKS

CCAP FA3N-C
3N-BBM+V Medium
CONCENTRATED STOCKS

Non-sterile concentrated stocks to make up 5 litres of 3N-BBM+V medium. 3N-BBM+V medium is used for

3N-BBM+V Medium<br>1 LITRE PREMADE

CCAP FA3N-P
3N-BBM+V Medium
1 LITRE PREMADE

1 litre of sterile, ready to use, 3N-BBM+V medium. 3N-BBM+V medium is used for culturing freshwater