References [ 7 ]
Luo W, Pröschold T, Bock C & Krienitz L (2010) Generic concept in Chlorella-related coccoid green algae (Chlorophyta, Trebouxiophyceae). Plant Biology 12: 545-553.
Pröschold T, Darienko T, Silva PC, Reisser W & Krienitz L (2011) The systematics of Zoochlorella revisited employing an integrative approach. Environmental Microbiology 13: 350-364.
Hoshina R, Iwataki M & Imamura N (2010) Chlorella variabilis and Micractinium reisseri sp. nov. (Chlorellaceae, Trebouxiophyceae): Redescription of the endosymbiotic green algae of Paramecium bursaria (Peniculia, Oligohymenophorea) in the 120th year. Phycological Research 58: 188-201.
van Etten JL, Lane LC & Meints RH (1991) Viruses and viruslike particles of eukaryotic algae Microbiological Reviews 55: 586-620.
DOI: none
Linz B, Linz A, Migunova AV & Kvitko KV (1999) Correlation between virus-sensitivity and isoenzyme spectrum in symbiotic Chlorella-like algae. Protistology 1: 76-81.
DOI: none
Hoshina R & Fujiwara Y (2013) Molecular characterization of Chlorella cultures of the National Institute for Environmental Studies culture collection with description of Micractinium inermum sp. nov., Didymogenes sphaerica sp. nov., and Didymogenes soliella sp. nov. (Chlorellaceae, Trebouxiophyceae). Phycological Research 61: 124-132.
Germond A, Hata H, Fujikawa Y & Nakajima T (2013) The phylogenetic position and phenotypic changes of a Chlorella-like alga during 5-year microcosm culture. European Journal of Phycology 48: 485-496.
Sequences [ 3 ]
EMBL/Genbank Links
(Bold text = submission by CCAP staff or collaborators)
18S-28S
Division/Phylum: Chlorophyta Class: Trebouxiophyceae Order: Chlorellales

Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and Adl et al. (2019) for protists.

Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium: 3N-BBM+V; Bacteria and other organisms present; maintained by serial subculture;
Attributes
AuthorityHoshina, Iwataki & Imamura 2010
IsolatorReisser (before 1975)
Collection Sitepond in the old Botanic Garden University of Göttingen, Germany
Notes was endosymbiotic to a Paramecium bursaria; Renamed Jul11 after Pröschold et al. (2011) Env. Microbiol. 13, 350-364. Renamed Jun12 after Hoshina et al. (2010) Phycol. Res. 58, 188-201 and Hoshina (2011) Phycol. Res. 59, 269-272.
Axenicity Status Bacteria and other organisms present
Area Europe
Country Germany
Environment Freshwater
GMO No
In Scope of Nagoya Protocol No
ABS Note Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain.
Collection Date pre 1975
Original Designation Pbi
Pathogen Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1
Strain Maintenance Sheet SM_FreshwaterGreens.pdf
Toxin Producer Not Toxic / No Data
Type Culture No
Taxonomy WoRMS ID 626014
Formerly Listed in CCAP asMicractinium conductrix (Brandt) Pröschold & Darienko,Chlorella sp.

CCAP 211/83

Micractinium reisseri


Related Products

3N-BBM+V Medium<br>CONCENTRATED STOCKS

CCAP FA3N-C
3N-BBM+V Medium
CONCENTRATED STOCKS

Non-sterile concentrated stocks to make up 5 litres of 3N-BBM+V medium. 3N-BBM+V medium is used for

3N-BBM+V Medium<br>1 LITRE PREMADE

CCAP FA3N-P
3N-BBM+V Medium
1 LITRE PREMADE

1 litre of sterile, ready to use, 3N-BBM+V medium. 3N-BBM+V medium is used for culturing freshwater