References [ 5 ]
Bock C, Pröschold T & Krienitz L (2010) Two new Dictyosphaerium-morphotype lineages of the Chlorellaceae (Trebouxiophyceae): Heynigia gen. nov. and Hindakia gen. nov. European Journal of Phycology 45: 267-277.
Krienitz L, Bock C, Kotut K & Proschold T (2012) Genotypic diversity of Dictyosphaerium-morphospecies (Chlorellaceae, Trebouxiophyceae) in African inland waters, including the description of four new genera. Fottea 12: 231-253.
DOI: none
Hoshina R & Fujiwara Y (2013) Molecular characterization of Chlorella cultures of the National Institute for Environmental Studies culture collection with description of Micractinium inermum sp. nov., Didymogenes sphaerica sp. nov., and Didymogenes soliella sp. nov. (Chlorellaceae, Trebouxiophyceae). Phycological Research 61: 124-132.
Bock C, Krienitz L & Proschold T (2011) Taxonomic reassessment of the genus Chlorella (Trebouxiophyceae) using molecular signatures (barcodes), including description of seven new species. Fottea 11: 293-312.
DOI: none
Slocombe SP, Zhang QY, Ross M, Anderson A, Thomas NJ, Lapresa A, Rad Menéndez C, Campbell CN, Black KD, Stanley MS & Day JG (2015) Unlocking nature's treasure-chest: Screening for oleaginous algae. Scientific Reports 5: 09844.
Sequences [ 1 ]
EMBL/Genbank Links
(Bold text = submission by CCAP staff or collaborators)
Division/Phylum: Chlorophyta Class: Trebouxiophyceae Order: Chlorellales

Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and Adl et al. (2019) for protists.

Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium: 3N-BBM+V; Bacteria present; maintained by serial subculture;
Attributes
AuthorityBock, Pröschold & Krienitz 2010
IsolatorJaworski (1972)
Collection Site Windermere, Cumbria, England, UK
Notes Authentic Strain
Axenicity Status Bacteria present
Area Europe
Country UK
Environment Freshwater
GMO No
In Scope of Nagoya Protocol No
ABS Note Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain.
Collection Date 1972
Original Designation FBA L246
Pathogen Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1
Strain Maintenance Sheet SM_FreshwaterGreens.pdf
Toxin Producer Not Toxic / No Data
Type Culture Yes
Taxonomy WoRMS ID 624188
Formerly Listed in CCAP asDictyosphaerium pulchellum Wood (1872)

CCAP 222/2D

Heynigia dictyosphaerioides


Related Products

3N-BBM+V Medium<br>CONCENTRATED STOCKS

CCAP FA3N-C
3N-BBM+V Medium
CONCENTRATED STOCKS

Non-sterile concentrated stocks to make up 5 litres of 3N-BBM+V medium. 3N-BBM+V medium is used for

3N-BBM+V Medium<br>1 LITRE PREMADE

CCAP FA3N-P
3N-BBM+V Medium
1 LITRE PREMADE

1 litre of sterile, ready to use, 3N-BBM+V medium. 3N-BBM+V medium is used for culturing freshwater