References [ 7 ]
Day JG (2004) Cryopreservation: fundamentals, mechanisms of damage on freezing/thawing and application in culture collections Nova Hedwigia 79: 191-205.
Day JG, Watanabe MM, Morris GJ, Fleck RA & McLellan MR (1997) Long-term viability of preserved eukaryotic algae. Journal of Applied Phycology 9: 121-127.
Harding K, Müller J, Lorenz M, Timmerman H, Friedl T, Day JG & Benson EE (2008) Deployment of the encapsulation/dehydration protocol to cryopreserve microalgae held at Sammlung von Algenkulturen, Universität Göttingen Germany. CryoLetters 29: 15-20.
DOI: none
Morris GJ (1978) Cryopreservation of 250 strains of Chlorococcales by the method of two-step cooling European Journal of Phycology 13: 15-24.
Verschoor AM, van der Stap I, Helmsing NR, Lurling M & van Donk E (2004) Inducible colony formation within the Scenedesmaceae: Adaptive responses to infochemicals from two different herbivore taxa. Journal of Phycology 40: 808-814.
Klassen V, Blifernez-Klassen O, Hoekzema Y, Mussgnug JH & Kruse O (2015) A novel one-stage cultivation/fermentation strategy for improved biogas production with microalgal biomass. Journal of Biotechnology 215: 44-51.
Escapa C, Coimbra RN, Paniagua S, García AI & Otero M (2016) Comparative assessment of diclofenac removal from water by different microalgae strains. Algal Research 18: 127-134.
Sequences [ 1 ]
EMBL/Genbank Links
(Bold text = submission by CCAP staff or collaborators)
(Bold text = submission by CCAP staff or collaborators)
SSU (18S)
Division/Phylum: Chlorophyta Class: Chlorophyceae Order: Sphaeropleales
Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology
and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee
that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive
from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and
Adl et al. (2019) for protists.
Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium:
PP;
Bacteria and other organisms present; maintained by serial subculture and cryopreserved;
| Attributes | |
| Authority | (Turpin) Wynne 2016 |
| Isolator | Chodat (1923) |
| Collection Site | pond near Neudorf/Basel, Switzerland |
| Notes | Name changed after sequencing 2020. |
| Axenicity Status | Bacteria and other organisms present |
| Area | Europe |
| Country | Switzerland |
| Environment | Freshwater |
| GMO | No |
| In Scope of Nagoya Protocol | No |
| ABS Note | Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain. |
| Collection Date | c 1923 |
| Original Designation | Strain 1; ON 700a; pp123 |
| Pathogen | Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1 |
| Strain Maintenance Sheet | SM_FreshwaterGreens.pdf |
| Toxin Producer | Not Toxic / No Data |
| Type Culture | No |
| Taxonomy WoRMS ID | 1359367 |
| Equivalent Strains | ATCC 30434,SAG 276-1,UTEX 83 |
| Formerly Listed in CCAP as | Scenedesmus basiliensis |
CCAP 276/1A
Tetradesmus obliquus
- Product Code: CCAP 276/1A
- Availability: See Availability/Lead Times