References [ 2 ]
Rindi F, Lam DW & López-Bautista JM (2009) Phylogenetic relationships and species circumscription in Trentepohlia and Printzina (Trentepohliales, Chlorophyta). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 52: 329-339.
López-Bautista JM & Chapman RL (2003) Phylogenetic affinities of the Trentepohliales inferred from small-subunit rDNA. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 53: 2099-2106.
Sequences [ 2 ]
EMBL/Genbank Links
(Bold text = submission by CCAP staff or collaborators)
Division/Phylum: Chlorophyta Class: Ulvophyceae Order: Trentepohliales

Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and Adl et al. (2019) for protists.

Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium: SBBM (97% 3N-BBM+V; 3% SE2); Bacteria and other organisms present; maintained by serial subculture and cryopreserved;
Attributes
Authority(Nylander) Hariot 1889
IsolatorGeorge (1962)
Collection Site Kampala, Uganda
Notes Thought to be a coffee parasite
Axenicity Status Bacteria and other organisms present
Country Uganda
Environment Air
GMO No
In Scope of Nagoya Protocol No
ABS Note Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain.
Collection Date c 1962
Pathogen Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1
Strain Maintenance Sheet
Toxin Producer Not Toxic / No Data
Type Culture No
Taxonomy WoRMS ID 615618

CCAP 483/2

Trentepohlia dialepta