References [ 2 ]
Eddy BP (1956) The suitability of some algae for mass cultivation for food, with special reference to Dunaliella bioculata. Journal of Experimental Botany 21: 372-380.
Natrah FMI, Kenmegne MM, Wiyoto W, Sorgeloos P, Bossier P & Defoirdt T (2011) Effects of micro-algae commonly used in aquaculture on acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing. Aquaculture 317: 53-57.
Division/Phylum: Chlorophyta Class: Chlorodendrophyceae Order: Chlorodendrales

Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and Adl et al. (2019) for protists.

Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium: SNA; Axenic; Cryopreserved;
Attributes
Authority(West) Butcher 1959
IsolatorGeorge (1950)
Collection Sitesalt marsh Brancaster, Norfolk, England, UK
Archive Date 2022-01-05 17:21:39
Archive Reason Dead
Axenicity Status Axenic
Area Europe
Country UK
Environment Brackish
In Scope of Nagoya Protocol No
ABS Note Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain.
Collection Date c 1950
Pathogen Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1
Toxin Producer Not Toxic / No Data
Type Culture No
Equivalent StrainsSAG 161-2c
Other DesignationsSMBA 231

CCAP 66/1B

Tetraselmis tetrathele

  • Product Code: CCAP 66/1B
  • Availability: Archived
This strain is Archived, see strain data below for archive reason. Please contact us for more information.