References [ 7 ]
Daugbjerg N & Andersen RA (1997) A molecular phylogeny of the heterokont algae based on analyses of chloroplast-encoded rbcL sequence data. Journal of Phycology 33: 1031-1041.
Andersen RA, Brett RW, Potter D & Sexton JP (1998) Phylogeny of the Eustigmatophyceae based upon 18S rDNA, with emphasis on Nannochloropsis. Protist 149: 61-74.
Beacham TA, Bradley C, White DA, Bond P & Ali ST (2014) Lipid productivity and cell wall ultrastructure of six strains of Nannochloropsis: Implications for biofuel production and downstream processing. Algal Research 6: 64-69.
Slocombe SP, Zhang QY, Ross M, Anderson A, Thomas NJ, Lapresa A, Rad Menéndez C, Campbell CN, Black KD, Stanley MS & Day JG (2015) Unlocking nature's treasure-chest: Screening for oleaginous algae. Scientific Reports 5: 09844.
DOI: 10.1038/srep09844
Hughes AH, Magot F, Tawfike A, Rad-Menéndez C, Thomas N, Young LC, Stucchi L, Carettoni D, Stanley MS, Edrada-Ebel R & Duncan KR (2021) Exploring the chemical space of macro- and micro- algae using comparative metabolomics Microorganisms 9: 311.
Hughes AH, Magot F, Tawfike AF, Rad Menéndez C, Thomas N, Young LC, Stucchi L, Carettoni D, Stanley MS, Edrada-EBel R & Duncan KR (2021) Exploring the chemical space of macro- and micro-algae using comparative metabolomics. Microorganisms 9: 311.
Sánchez-Sandoval DS, González-Ortega O, Vazquez-Martínez J, García de la Cruz RF & Soria-Guerra RE (2022) Diclofenac removal by the microalgae species Chlorella vulgaris, Nannochloropsis oculata, Scenedesmus acutus, and Scenedesmus obliquus 3 Biotech 12: 210.
Division/Phylum: Heterokontophyta/Ochrophyta Class: Eustigmatophyceae Order: Eustigmatales
Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology
and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee
that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive
from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and
Adl et al. (2019) for protists.
Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium:
SNA;
Minimal or unobserved bacteria under normal growth conditions; maintained by serial subculture and cryopreserved;
| Attributes | |
| Authority | (Droop) Hibberd 1981 |
| Isolator | Stirn (1969) |
| Collection Site | Lake of Tunis, Tunisia |
| Axenicity Status | Minimal or unobserved bacteria under normal growth conditions |
| Area | Africa |
| Country | Tunisia |
| Environment | Marine |
| GMO | No |
| In Scope of Nagoya Protocol | No |
| ABS Note | Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain. |
| Collection Date | c 1969 |
| Original Designation | Tunis |
| Pathogen | Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1 |
| Strain Maintenance Sheet | SM_MarineGreens.pdf |
| Toxin Producer | Not Toxic / No Data |
| Type Culture | No |
| Taxonomy WoRMS ID | 376148 |
| Equivalent Strains | CCMP533,CSIRO CS-192 |
| Formerly Listed in CCAP as | Nannochloropsis sp. |
CCAP 849/7
Nannochloropsis oculata
- Product Code: CCAP 849/7
- Availability: See Availability/Lead Times