References [ 5 ]
Peck RK (2010) Structure of loricae and stalks of several bacterivorous Chrysomonads (Chrysophyceae): Taxonomical importance and possible ecological significance. Protist 161: 148-159.
Sanders RW, Williamson CE, Stutzman PL, Moeller RE, Goulden CE & Aoki-Goldsmith R (1996) Reproductive success of "herbivorous" zooplankton fed algal and nonalgal food resources. Limnology and Oceanography 41: 1295-1305.
DOI: none
Boucard TK, Parry J, Jones K & Semple KT (2004) Effects of organophosphate and synthetic pyrethroid sheep dip formulations on protozoan survival and bacterial survival and growth Fems Microbiology Letters 47: 11-127.
Caron DA, Lim EL, Dennett MR, Gast RJ, Kosman C & DeLong EF (1999) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the heterotrophic chrysophyte genus Paraphysomonas (Chrysophyceae), and the design of rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for two species. Journal of Phycology 35: 824-837.
DOI: none
Scoble JM & Cavalier-Smith T (2014) Scale evolution in Paraphysomonadida (Chrysophyceae): Sequence phylogeny and revised taxonomy of Paraphysomonas, new genus Clathromonas, and 25 new species. European Journal of Protistology 50: 551-592.
Division/Phylum: Heterokontophyta/Ochrophyta Class: Chrysophyceae Order: Chromulinales
Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology
and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee
that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive
from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and
Adl et al. (2019) for protists.
Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium:
NCL;
Bacteria and other organisms present; maintained by serial subculture; + wheat; contains nanoflagellates (not fungi)
| Attributes | |
| Authority | (Stokes) de Saedeleer 1929 |
| Isolator | Cowling (1988) |
| Collection Site | Priest Pot, Cumbria, England, UK |
| Climatic Zone | Temperate |
| Notes | Identified by K J Clarke (CCAP) |
| Axenicity Status | Bacteria and other organisms present |
| Area | Europe |
| Country | UK |
| Environment | Freshwater |
| GMO | No |
| In Scope of Nagoya Protocol | No |
| ABS Note | Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain. |
| Collection Date | c 1988 |
| Original Designation | RS/12 |
| Pathogen | Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1 |
| Strain Maintenance Sheet | SM_Paraphysomonasvestita.pdf |
| Toxin Producer | Not Toxic / No Data |
| Type Culture | No |
| Taxonomy WoRMS ID | 341605 |
CCAP 935/14
Paraphysomonas vestita
- Product Code: CCAP 935/14
- Availability: See Availability/Lead Times