CCAP prices will be increasing in January 2025, Click Here for more information.
  • Ciliophrys infusionum
References [ 1 ]
Eccleston-Parry JD & Leadbeater BSC (1994) A comparison of the growth kinetics of six marine heterotrophic nanoflagellates fed with one bacterial species. Marine Ecology - Progress Series 105: 167-177.
DOI: none
Division/Phylum: - Class: Stramenopiles

Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and Adl et al. (2019) for protists.

Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium: NSW; Bacteria and fungi present; maintained by serial subculture; contains fungi
Attributes
AuthorityCienkowski 1876
IsolatorTong (1992)
Collection Siteestuarine water, c31ppt Mayflower Park, Southampton Water, England, UK
Notes Isolation: single cell picked out
Axenicity Status Bacteria and fungi present
Area Europe
Country UK
Environment Marine
GMO No
Group Protozoa
Latitude 50 54' N
Longitude 01 26' W
In Scope of Nagoya Protocol No
ABS Note Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain.
Collection Date c 1992
Pathogen Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1
Strain Maintenance Sheet
Toxin Producer Not Toxic / No Data
Type Culture No
Taxonomy WoRMS ID 375958

CCAP 1516/1

Ciliophrys infusionum