CCAP prices will be increasing in January 2025, Click Here for more information.
References [ 2 ]
Beirne N, Edmundson S, Gao S, Freeman J & Huesemann M (2023) A streamlined approach to characterize microalgae strains for biomass productivity under dynamic climate simulation conditions Algal Research 72: 103099.
Chae H, Kim EJ, Kim HS, Choi HG, Kim S & Kim JH (2023) Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of two Antarctic strains within the genera Carolibrandtia and Chlorella (Chlorellaceae, Trebouxiophyceae) Algae 38(4): 241-252.
Division/Phylum: Chlorophyta Class: Trebouxiophyceae Order: Chlorellales

Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and Adl et al. (2019) for protists.

Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium: BB; Bacteria and other organisms present; Cryopreserved;
Attributes
Authority(Fritsch) Wille 1923
IsolatorSutton (1970)
Collection Site Antarctica
Climatic Zone Polar
Axenicity Status Bacteria and other organisms present
Area Antarctica
Environment Freshwater
GMO No
In Scope of Nagoya Protocol No
ABS Note Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain.
Collection Date c 1970
Original Designation IU 1959
Pathogen Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1
Strain Maintenance Sheet SM_FreshwaterGreensPolar.pdf
Toxin Producer Not Toxic / No Data
Type Culture No
Taxonomy WoRMS ID 627715
Equivalent StrainsUTEX 1959

CCAP 211/45

Chlorella antarctica