References [ 14 ]

Invidia M, Sei S & Gorbi G (2004) Survival of the copepod Acartia tonsa following egg exposure to near anoxia and to sulfide at different pH values. Marine Ecology - Progress Series 276: 187-196.

DOI: 10.3354/meps276187

Robertson PKJ, Black KD, Adams M, Willis K, Buchan F, Orr H, Lawton L & McCullagh C (2009) A new generation of biocides for control of crustacea in fish farms. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 95: 58-63.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2008.12.009

Sei S, Invidia M & Gorbi G (2006) Near anoxia and sulfide as possible factors influencing the spatial distribution of Acartia tonsa and Acartia clausi: Comparative evaluation of egg tolerance. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 337: 121-130.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2006.05.015

Leonardos N & Lucas IAN (2000) The use of larval fatty acids as an index of growth in Mytilus edulis L. larvae. Aquaculture 184: 155-166.

DOI: none

Leonardos N & Lucas IAN (2000) The nutritional value of algae grown under different culture conditions for Mytilus edulis L. larvae. Aquaculture 182: 301-315.

DOI: none

Zhang J, Wu C, Pellegrini D, Romano G, Esposito F, Ianora A & Buttino I (2013) Effects of different monoalgal diets on egg production, hatching success and apoptosis induction in a Mediterranean population of the calanoid copepod Acartia tonsa (Dana). Aquaculture 400-401: 65-72.

DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.02.032

Leonardos N & Geider RJ (2005) Elemental and biochemical composition of Rhinomonas reticulata (Cryptophyta) in relation to light and nitrate-to-phosphate supply ratios. Journal of Phycology 41: 567-576.

DOI: none

Zhang J, Ianora A, Wu C, Pellegrini D, Esposito F & Buttino I (2014) How to increase productivity of the copepod Acartia tonsa (Dana): Effects of population density and food concentration. Aquaculture Research -: 1-9.

DOI: 10.1111/are.12456

Marti-Solans J, Ferrandez-Roldan A, Godoy-Marin H, Badia-Ramentol J, Torres-Aguila NP, Rodriguez-Mari A, Bouquet JM, Chourrout D, Thompson EM, Albalat R & Canestro C (2014) Oikopleura dioica culturing made easy: A low-cost facility for an emerging animal model in EvoDevo. Genesis 53: 183-193.

DOI: 10.1002/dvg.22800

Slocombe SP, Zhang QY, Ross M, Anderson A, Thomas NJ, Lapresa A, Rad Menéndez C, Campbell CN, Black KD, Stanley MS & Day JG (2015) Unlocking nature's treasure-chest: Screening for oleaginous algae. Scientific Reports 5: 09844.

DOI: 10.1038/srep09844

Bouquet JM, Spriet E, Troedsson C, Ottera H, Chourrout D & Thompson EM (2009) Culture optimization for the emergent zooplanktonic model organism Oikopleura dioica. Journal of Plankton Research 31: 359-370.

DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbn132

Olsen BR, Dahlgren K, Schander C, Bamstedt U, Rapp HT & Troedsson C (2012) PCR-DHPLC assay for the identification of predator-prey interactions. Journal of Plankton Research 34: 277-285.

DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbr110

Cunningham BR, Greenwold ML, Lachenmyer EM, Heidenreich KM, Davis AC, Dudycha JL & Richardson TL (2018) Light capture and pigment diversity in marine and freshwater cryptophytes Journal of Phycology -: -.

DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12816

Merritt KA & Richardson TL (2024) Variability in spectral absorption within cryptophyte phycobiliprotein types. Journal of Phycology 60: 528-540.

DOI: 10.1111/jpy.13439

Division/Phylum: Cryptophyta Class: Cryptophyceae Order: Pyrenomonadales

Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and Adl et al. (2019) for protists.

Culture media, purity and growth conditions:

Medium: MASM; Bacteria present; maintained by serial subculture;

Attributes
Authority	Novarino 1991
Isolator	Unknown
Axenicity Status	Bacteria present
Environment	Marine
GMO	No
In Scope of Nagoya Protocol	No
ABS Note	Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain.
Collection Date	pre 1986
Original Designation	Heligoland III
Pathogen	Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1
Special Uses	used in aquaculture
Strain Maintenance Sheet	SM_MarineAquaculture.pdf
Toxin Producer	Not Toxic / No Data
Type Culture	No
Taxonomy WoRMS ID
Formerly Listed in CCAP as	Rhodomonas sp.

CCAP 995/2

Rhinomonas reticulata var. reticulata

Product Code: CCAP 995/2
Availability: See Availability/Lead Times

Qty